EXPERIENCE IS A SYSTEM, NOT A PROGRAM

Experience rarely fails because organizations don’t care. It fails because responsibility is fragmented.

Over time, many organizations treat experience as a set of initiatives: surveys, journeys, dashboards, training programs. Each is useful, but none is sufficient on its own. Without governance, decision rights, and clear accountability, experience becomes everyone’s priority and no one’s responsibility.

I see experience as a system. A system that starts with listening, but only creates value when insight is translated into decisions, and decisions are reinforced through leadership behavior, operating models, and measurement.

In regulated or high-stakes environments, this matters even more. Ethical boundaries, compliance, and long-term outcomes cannot be retrofitted. They have to be designed into the system from the start.

The question I always ask is not “Do we have insight?” but “Where does this insight change a decision?” If the answer is unclear, the system is incomplete.

Listening without action erodes trust.

Whether the voice comes from customers, patients, or employees, the expectation is the same: that sharing experience leads to meaningful change. When it doesn’t, engagement declines and skepticism grows.

Closing the loop is not about communicating results faster. It is about clarity. Clarity on which insights matter, which decisions they inform, and which actions follow.

In my work, I focus on three elements: prioritization, ownership, and visibility.

Prioritization ensures leaders are not overwhelmed. Ownership ensures insight is not diluted across functions. Visibility ensures progress is tracked and learned from, not just reported.

Technology and AI can accelerate this process, but they don’t replace judgment. The real value lies in designing decision pathways that leaders trust and use.

FROM INSIGHT TO ACTION: CLOSING THE LOOP

USING AI RESPONSIBLY IN EXPERIENCE WORK

AI has changed how we can listen, analyze, and respond at scale. It has not changed our responsibility.

In experience and insight work, AI is most powerful when it augments human judgment rather than replaces it. Pattern detection, text analysis, and predictive signals can surface risks and opportunities earlier, but decisions still require context, ethics, and accountability.

Responsible use of AI means clear governance: understanding what data is used, how outputs are interpreted, and where human oversight remains essential. Especially in healthcare and other regulated environments, this is not optional.

I see AI as an accelerator of learning, not a shortcut to answers. Its value depends on the system it operates within.

Get in touch

I would love to know what you think...